top line
Chairman of the National University Athletic Association was suggested On Tuesday, a new tier of Division I sports will be created for schools with the most deep-pocketed athletic departments. Under this scheme, students receive payments directly through a trust fund, their name, image and likeness rights are traded directly with the school, and they receive unlimited educational benefits. This has the potential to bring major changes to college sports, and he acknowledges that this is one of the biggest criticisms.
important facts
If this proposal were implemented, Division I schools would be able to choose whether to participate in the new tier, but Division I schools outside of the new tier would still be able to provide unlimited educational benefits to their students. (education-related cash payments are currently limited), name, image and likeness arrangements with students.
The proposed system would require upper-tier schools to contribute at least $30,000 per player annually for at least half of their players, and would use this “Enhanced Education Trust Fund” to The “Education Trust Fund” is officially designed to pay for athletes to pursue further education during their training period. ESPN reports that the NCAA has not set spending requirements for the summer or post-career.
NCAA President Charlie Baker outlined the proposal: letter In it, he wrote that the current state of college sports creates disparities between the wealthiest athletic programs and the rest of the field, and between male and female athletes.
Baker said the advent of name, image and likeness agreements and transfer portals (two recent additions to NCAA collegiate sports systems) have created a gap between programs that spend the most money in college athletics and the rest of the world. He said that the disparities between the two countries are becoming more complex.
Baker said the proposal would address gender disparities by requiring universities to provide name, image and likeness contracts to female athletes, who don’t have as many contracts as male athletes. (These contracts must be Title IX compliant, which requires equal funding for men’s and women’s sports).
Baker and other NCAA leaders have long urged Congress to help regulate college sports, and he said the proposal could serve as a model for Congress to use when deciding on legislation related to college sports. He said there is.
Contra
The new proposed system would still consider players to be employees, without providing them with a salary or allowing them to form a union.
Points to note
How will this proposal be received? Professor Baker plans to submit the proposal to Division I schools this week. Schools will have the opportunity to receive feedback on the proposal, but there is no timeline yet for when or how final approval will be determined.
what we don’t know
If approved, when will this go into effect and what impact will this new tier have on the fields and courts, including whether they will compete normally against other Division I schools in postseason tournaments and playoffs? . The arrangements for determining the amount of compensation for individual players are also unclear.
Main background
College sports and the NCAA have long faced criticism over the fact that athletes go unpaid while universities, athletic conferences and the NCAA make billions of dollars. NCAA rules strictly prohibit athletes from receiving paychecks from their schools, and previously prohibited them from even making money on their fame (in the form of name, image, and likeness) earned as college athletes. Ta. In 2019, California became the first state to pass a law forcing the NCAA to allow athletes in the state to earn money using their name, image and likeness. Other states are expected to follow suit, with 20 states expected to enact it by 2021, and the NCAA has made the policy the national standard. After this, athletes in college sports, especially the most famous football and basketball players, began raking in huge sums of money through these name, image, and likeness deals. However, they are still prohibited from receiving paychecks from universities for playing or from universities directly receiving money earned from playing college sports. However, a number of ongoing lawsuits against the NCAA threaten to force the NCAA to pay its players. Among them is a class-action lawsuit brought by Arizona State University swimmer Grant House, who specifically asked the court to overturn a rule that prohibits schools from entering into name, image and likeness agreements with their athletes. Also included.
important quotes
Ross Dellenger of Yahoo Sports called the proposal “perhaps the most innovative concept introduced by a sitting NCAA leader in the history of college athletics.”
References
NCAA proposes new college athletics division based on direct compensation to athletes (Yahoo Sports)
NCAA’s new proposal takes a step toward compensating athletes (Front Office Sports)
NCAA proposes rules to allow schools and players to sign NIL contracts (ESPN)
follow me twitter Or LinkedIn. Send us a safe tip.